Farmers asked to take part in wind
discussions
4/1/2009
11:40:49 AM
By DELORES MEISTER
As wind power development legislation moves its way through
the Nebraska Legislature, farmers are being urged to take part in an upcoming
legislative hearing to make their concerns known about possible changes in the
states wind power energy plans.
“We’re all people who are affected by this,” said Graham
Christensen of
Of concern to Christensen and others is legislation that
would affect the current Community-Based Energy Development (C-BED) law that
requires farmers and landowners to have the opportunity to invest in wind
farms.
“Wind is one of our most abundant natural resources.
Christensen and other Farmers Union representatives say
Legislative Bill 561 which will be heard Friday before the Legislatures Natural
Resources Committee would change Community-Based Energy Development. In
essence, it would curtail private citizens from investing in wind energy, the
Farmers Union says.
Supporters of the legislation argue that wind power
development in Nebraska may be delayed a golden opportunity missed, in effect
because average Nebraskans cant afford to put up the investment capital needed
for some large wind projects. Because of that,
The Nebraska Farmers Union and others dispute that
contention.
“With C-BED as it is written, suppose you had the opportunity
to sign into a 20-year signed power purchase agreement to sell your wind
energy. It is very possible for
“C-BED allows
The equity partner makes use of available production tax credits (PTC), which is the
major driver of wind energy development nationwide, as a way to offset taxes in
other areas of income.
“
“What’s attractive about the C-BED legislation is that after
the 10-year life span of the production tax credit expires, the project is
paid off, the ownership flips and the minority
C-BED maximizes rural economic development by allowing
economic benefits to stay in
“But an amendment added to LB561, if passed, would bring
significant changes to the law. It would turn a significant portion of local
community’s 33 percent return over to third-party financing entities,”
Christensen said.
By bringing in a third-party financer for principal and
interest purposes, the debt financing would have to be paid to the third party,
thus potentially removing income that
But supporters say that those third parties are needed for
The other issue deals with the initial
language of LB561. This allows all wind development models (not just
C-BED wind projects) to be able to have the ability to negotiate away public
powers eminent domain authority for renewable energy projects.
Christensen stated that allowing multi-national electric
utilities to have this ability when developing wind in
“Looking down the road, I could see how this could open up a
crack that would invite these utilities to set up shop in our state and
jeopardize our prized cooperative-owned power system,” he said.
“Leases for land and wind seem like a lot of money until you
compare it to what you get when you have ownership in it,” Christensen said.
“The income will be huge, and it is in the best interests of Nebraskans to keep
ownership in renewable energy as we move quickly into the future we are opposed
to amending or changing C-BED as it was originally written.”